An independent study testing whether astrological convergence (several distinct timing techniques pointing to the same period) can identify the turning points a person reports across their life.
Your chart is read blind, from birth data alone. The years it flags are frozen before your answers are opened, then compared with the turning points you report.
Three related questions, evaluated separately, because a method can succeed at one and fail at another. Each is scored on its own terms and reported on its own line.
When several distinct timing techniques agree, are your reported turning points ranked more highly? The central claim: overlapping signals carry more predictive information than any one technique alone.
Techniques examinedWhen a technique flags a turning point, how closely does its predicted period match the reported date? A broad indication and a precise forecast are not the same thing.
ResolutionDoes your real birth chart perform better than plausible incorrect charts? This tests whether the correct birth data adds anything beyond general age patterns or common cycles.
The comparisonsThis study publishes in three phases, each one a deeper look as the data grows: a first read of the signal at 400 charts, a stronger pass with tighter estimates at 2,500, and the complete analysis at 5,000.
A first look at the data once 400 charts are in. Early signal, wide error bars, published openly.
The analysis rerun at 2,500 charts. Tighter estimates, subgroup checks, and a look at what held up from Phase 1.
The complete analysis at 5,000 charts. The final word on what this study found, hits and misses alike.
Status: the first milestone is still filling. Preliminary findings will be published right here the moment Phase 1 completes, every participant gets word when they land, and the analysis then rolls forward through the expanded and full phases as more charts arrive.
Blind first. Your chart is calculated and its convergence years recorded before anyone reads your answers.
Misses published. The findings will include where this fails. That's the point of running it.